2 Comments
User's avatar
includeMeOut's avatar

"I respect free-energy theorists, but they can’t all be right, as I have seen about a dozen alternative physics models, and the primary upshot of all of them is free energy. "

Perhaps not all but some of them are correct and there is more than one technological/methodological approach to accessing "free energy"?

Even if all the hypothesis for how it does so are incorrect, if it works, it works.

Do we really understand how induction works to generate a current via electro-magnetism?

Sort of...?

Expand full comment
Wade Frazier's avatar

Yes, there is more than one way to tap the zero-point field, but most of the theories are not about any technologies, per se, but just theories on how the universe works. Sparky wrote papers on the physics behind his gizmo. I think that most free-energy inventors don't understand the physics much, if at all, but they just know that it works. That scientist-inventor who worked with Gilliland, named Max, demonstrated his device to many scientists, and he said that if anybody could explain why his device worked, he would give it to them. Nobody could. :) So yeah, alternative-physics theories and free-energy technology are two different things, and when you know that free-energy tech exists, the battles over the theory, by people who don't have free-energy devices to study, is not very interesting to me. If and when that technology comes into the open, it will settle a lot, including ending many of those debates.

This is obviously a big subject (and the most important on Earth). I think that some free-energy tech is really tapping the electric potential between the atmosphere and ground, which Tesla attempted to do. I doubt that that is a viable "free energy" source for the Fifth Epoch, but from what I have heard about zero-point tech, it would be.

The global elite who have free-energy and antigravity tech likely have plenty of theory to explain how they work, and my guess is that they have some kind of unified field theory to explain it. As I stated, theory is going to bring up the rear on this one. I accept that all theories at these levels may seem nonsensical in ways, like quantum theory often seems. To your point, if it works, it works. Theory is important, and even the crux of science, but it has its limitations. My mystical material has stated that the science of consciousness is the greatest science of all, and Western science has barely scratched the surface. Just give me free-energy and antigravity tech, and those scientific frontiers can be explored at humanity's leisure. We have some existential problems to solve, first. :)

Expand full comment