If phenomena such as “free energy” or overunity power generation is shown as demonstrably true, including the use of the scientific method as confirmation, and someone claims it cannot be true since it violates the “laws of physics” then those “laws” require amendment…obviously.
Many times it turns out that those “laws” are not so much incorrect but rather too limited and constrained as knowledge and experience expands.
And institutional science, muchly grant funded with careerist vested interests, tied to the MIC, will resist. This has gotten worse since academia has been increasingly corporatized over the past few decades under financialized monopoly capitalism.
That was a keen summary, kind of comprehensive, dare I say. :)
One of the biggest parts of the problem is that free energy is such an overwhelming issue. It does not take too much intelligence to understand that its arrival will mean the end of the world as we know it. This is why free-energy inventors go crazy, declare themselves to be the Messiah and expect to be paid a trillion dollars, why their "allies" constantly try to steal it (which usually destroys the effort, and is why free-energy inventor paranoia is not THAT delusional), why billionaires would swarm Dennis and Greer when they were riding high, why a trillion dollars or so has gone into suppressing free-energy and related technologies, why a dissident faction of the global elite kidnapped my friend to show him free energy, antigravity, and other mind-blowing technologies, why mainstream scientists react with fear and denial, calling free energy not only "impossible" but undesirable, why it is unmentionable in mainstream, "progressive," and academic circles and the media, why the issue never rises above tabloid levels on the right, etc. Newcomers often think that they have the answer that nobody ever thought of, but they are invariably approaches that have been tried many times. There is not another three-ring circus like it on Earth.
Very few people can keep their feet on the ground and deal with the subject, which is one reason why I have a comprehensive approach to it, to help ground people, to help keep them from flying off in all sorts of crazy directions, to help them see the bigger picture. Part of that process is learning that today's "laws of physics" are hopelessly inadequate to deal with the principles behind those technologies, and I doubt that even the people who possess those technologies have theories that fully explain them. My suspicion is that if and when those technologies come to public awareness and mainstream scientists can study them, something like a unified field theory will come from that study, but I would like to see the elite theories, first, which likely came from ETs to some degree.
A cursory study of quantum theory makes it clear that the universe likely operates in ways that will always be beyond full human comprehension. We can only grope forward slowly. Greer is right to call the past century the "lost century," as we would live a Star Trek-like existence if those technologies became publicly used. I can appreciate the fearful and the naysayers who argue that we are not ready for that, but are we ready to exterminate ourselves, instead? When I began understanding the Epochs of the human journey better, I developed more sympathy toward all of the denial and fear when free energy is even mentioned. People who react like that are not going to help make it happen, and that is OK. They will only begin to understand when the Fifth Epoch arrives, not before, and that is normal. Only a tiny fraction of humanity will right the ship, but the Industrial Revolution did not ride on that many shoulders, either. Keep up the comments...
I would say the key to “comprehensive analysis” lies in pattern recognition which, in this increasingly specialized and cartelized system, is not overly valued. Although it is featured in IQ tests.
It did gain me intermittent success in the IT world. 👏
Yes, pattern recognition is the mark of a generalist, a la Fuller, and it is also key to becoming a comprehensivist. Fuller remarked on the tunnel vision of specialists in science, and he thought that it was a ruling-class tactic to keep scientists from seeing the big picture. Yes, today's systems often churn out specialists of their little niches who can't see beyond them. This is also related to the atomization of people that Chomsky remarked on, to keep people separated and easily dominated. However, multidisciplinary efforts have become more prominent, which is a big step in the right direction.
1st sentence: "People have break free" should be "have to break".
Thanks!
If phenomena such as “free energy” or overunity power generation is shown as demonstrably true, including the use of the scientific method as confirmation, and someone claims it cannot be true since it violates the “laws of physics” then those “laws” require amendment…obviously.
Many times it turns out that those “laws” are not so much incorrect but rather too limited and constrained as knowledge and experience expands.
And institutional science, muchly grant funded with careerist vested interests, tied to the MIC, will resist. This has gotten worse since academia has been increasingly corporatized over the past few decades under financialized monopoly capitalism.
That was a keen summary, kind of comprehensive, dare I say. :)
One of the biggest parts of the problem is that free energy is such an overwhelming issue. It does not take too much intelligence to understand that its arrival will mean the end of the world as we know it. This is why free-energy inventors go crazy, declare themselves to be the Messiah and expect to be paid a trillion dollars, why their "allies" constantly try to steal it (which usually destroys the effort, and is why free-energy inventor paranoia is not THAT delusional), why billionaires would swarm Dennis and Greer when they were riding high, why a trillion dollars or so has gone into suppressing free-energy and related technologies, why a dissident faction of the global elite kidnapped my friend to show him free energy, antigravity, and other mind-blowing technologies, why mainstream scientists react with fear and denial, calling free energy not only "impossible" but undesirable, why it is unmentionable in mainstream, "progressive," and academic circles and the media, why the issue never rises above tabloid levels on the right, etc. Newcomers often think that they have the answer that nobody ever thought of, but they are invariably approaches that have been tried many times. There is not another three-ring circus like it on Earth.
Very few people can keep their feet on the ground and deal with the subject, which is one reason why I have a comprehensive approach to it, to help ground people, to help keep them from flying off in all sorts of crazy directions, to help them see the bigger picture. Part of that process is learning that today's "laws of physics" are hopelessly inadequate to deal with the principles behind those technologies, and I doubt that even the people who possess those technologies have theories that fully explain them. My suspicion is that if and when those technologies come to public awareness and mainstream scientists can study them, something like a unified field theory will come from that study, but I would like to see the elite theories, first, which likely came from ETs to some degree.
A cursory study of quantum theory makes it clear that the universe likely operates in ways that will always be beyond full human comprehension. We can only grope forward slowly. Greer is right to call the past century the "lost century," as we would live a Star Trek-like existence if those technologies became publicly used. I can appreciate the fearful and the naysayers who argue that we are not ready for that, but are we ready to exterminate ourselves, instead? When I began understanding the Epochs of the human journey better, I developed more sympathy toward all of the denial and fear when free energy is even mentioned. People who react like that are not going to help make it happen, and that is OK. They will only begin to understand when the Fifth Epoch arrives, not before, and that is normal. Only a tiny fraction of humanity will right the ship, but the Industrial Revolution did not ride on that many shoulders, either. Keep up the comments...
I would say the key to “comprehensive analysis” lies in pattern recognition which, in this increasingly specialized and cartelized system, is not overly valued. Although it is featured in IQ tests.
It did gain me intermittent success in the IT world. 👏
Yes, pattern recognition is the mark of a generalist, a la Fuller, and it is also key to becoming a comprehensivist. Fuller remarked on the tunnel vision of specialists in science, and he thought that it was a ruling-class tactic to keep scientists from seeing the big picture. Yes, today's systems often churn out specialists of their little niches who can't see beyond them. This is also related to the atomization of people that Chomsky remarked on, to keep people separated and easily dominated. However, multidisciplinary efforts have become more prominent, which is a big step in the right direction.