Discussion about this post

User's avatar
includeMeOut's avatar

If phenomena such as “free energy” or overunity power generation is shown as demonstrably true, including the use of the scientific method as confirmation, and someone claims it cannot be true since it violates the “laws of physics” then those “laws” require amendment…obviously.

Many times it turns out that those “laws” are not so much incorrect but rather too limited and constrained as knowledge and experience expands.

And institutional science, muchly grant funded with careerist vested interests, tied to the MIC, will resist. This has gotten worse since academia has been increasingly corporatized over the past few decades under financialized monopoly capitalism.

Expand full comment
Bill Fairchild's avatar

1st sentence: "People have break free" should be "have to break".

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts