Greer's notion of establishing an open source live-streamed lab consisting of experts to work out these technologies sounds like a good idea, at least in principle.
But these engineers will need to be paid and while the amount needed will be "lunch money" to a billionaire the development of these things would spell the end of their dominance which is paradoxically based upon scarcity.
I would recommend the reading of his 2025 Briefing Document which concisely spells out the existence of these technologies, UFOs man made and ET, and more.
I doubt that it has changed a great deal since then. I once had all of Greer's books, but they became quite repetitive and they are not scholarly. What my friend saw in his underground show is enough for me. Yes, Greer's idea of open-sourcing, etc., is a good idea, but he did not always think that way. He has been growing in ways, but then he shoots himself in the foot with his "mini-alien" obsession. It seems that Ed Mitchell's disavowal of Greer's work might have been genuine (it certainly rang true). I keep Greer at arm's length. Brian liked and trusted Greer, and that counts for a lot for me, although I have also heard plenty of negative scuttlebutt. This should not all ride on one man's shoulders. Dennis did the hero's route, too. This is too big for that.
Greer is going the capitalist route with his latest effort, and I have strong doubts about that. Been there, done that, too many times. Maybe the miracle will happen and he will succeed where everybody else has failed, but I am not banking on it. Again, there should be many avenues tried, but the capitalist route is the least likely, IMO.
The paperback and digital versions are cheaper. I agree with you about the capitalist route, as for the rest, you have much more experience than myself.
I provided the seed money for the NEM conference that Greer spoke at in 2004, and I am glad that I heard him speak. He was the only speaker that I listened to. Brian O was one of many people that Greer and I have in common. I have spent quite a bit on money on Greer and such (I spent $17K on my NEM experience), and I have spent as much as I want to. I have a bunch of Greer's DVDs, and one that I bought was titled the "History of Free Energy." I was thinking that it would be something that started with Tesla and maybe before, to sketch the field to the present day, but it was instead Greer's talk about his naïve forays into the free-energy field. His dead man's trigger document covers some of that territory:
Giving a spook $250K to build a free-energy prototype (which was naturally not delivered) was highly naïve. Greer was a sheep to the shearing on that one. Greer has been too deeply involved with the spooks, IMO. Part of that comes with the territory of what he does, but he has also been led down the path at times. When the spooks killed several members of his team in 1997-1998, Greer was never the same. Believe me, I get it, and Greer is heroic to keep trying (Dennis's heroism was on an entirely different level - far higher - he should be dead dozens of times over), but the question that I have is whether such approaches have a chance of success. I don't want to bury anybody else whom I got involved in this stuff, which has a lot to do with my approach. It is the lamb's path, not the warrior's.
Greer's notion of establishing an open source live-streamed lab consisting of experts to work out these technologies sounds like a good idea, at least in principle.
But these engineers will need to be paid and while the amount needed will be "lunch money" to a billionaire the development of these things would spell the end of their dominance which is paradoxically based upon scarcity.
I would recommend the reading of his 2025 Briefing Document which concisely spells out the existence of these technologies, UFOs man made and ET, and more.
At $60, I'll pass:
https://shop.siriusdisclosure.com/products/the-disclosure-project-briefing-document-2025-hardcover?variant=49916905095451
Here is the 2001 version:
https://archive.org/stream/DisclosureProjectBriefingDocument/DisclosureProjectBriefingDocument_djvu.txt
I doubt that it has changed a great deal since then. I once had all of Greer's books, but they became quite repetitive and they are not scholarly. What my friend saw in his underground show is enough for me. Yes, Greer's idea of open-sourcing, etc., is a good idea, but he did not always think that way. He has been growing in ways, but then he shoots himself in the foot with his "mini-alien" obsession. It seems that Ed Mitchell's disavowal of Greer's work might have been genuine (it certainly rang true). I keep Greer at arm's length. Brian liked and trusted Greer, and that counts for a lot for me, although I have also heard plenty of negative scuttlebutt. This should not all ride on one man's shoulders. Dennis did the hero's route, too. This is too big for that.
Greer is going the capitalist route with his latest effort, and I have strong doubts about that. Been there, done that, too many times. Maybe the miracle will happen and he will succeed where everybody else has failed, but I am not banking on it. Again, there should be many avenues tried, but the capitalist route is the least likely, IMO.
The paperback and digital versions are cheaper. I agree with you about the capitalist route, as for the rest, you have much more experience than myself.
I provided the seed money for the NEM conference that Greer spoke at in 2004, and I am glad that I heard him speak. He was the only speaker that I listened to. Brian O was one of many people that Greer and I have in common. I have spent quite a bit on money on Greer and such (I spent $17K on my NEM experience), and I have spent as much as I want to. I have a bunch of Greer's DVDs, and one that I bought was titled the "History of Free Energy." I was thinking that it would be something that started with Tesla and maybe before, to sketch the field to the present day, but it was instead Greer's talk about his naïve forays into the free-energy field. His dead man's trigger document covers some of that territory:
https://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/steve.greer.dead.mans.trigger.pdf
Giving a spook $250K to build a free-energy prototype (which was naturally not delivered) was highly naïve. Greer was a sheep to the shearing on that one. Greer has been too deeply involved with the spooks, IMO. Part of that comes with the territory of what he does, but he has also been led down the path at times. When the spooks killed several members of his team in 1997-1998, Greer was never the same. Believe me, I get it, and Greer is heroic to keep trying (Dennis's heroism was on an entirely different level - far higher - he should be dead dozens of times over), but the question that I have is whether such approaches have a chance of success. I don't want to bury anybody else whom I got involved in this stuff, which has a lot to do with my approach. It is the lamb's path, not the warrior's.