Good question. What I have referred to as free energy has been called new energy and other terms. Dennis Lee used "free electricity," in the sense that there would be no fuel charge. Free energy also is a specialized term in thermodynamics (Gibbs), for instance. When I refer to free energy, I am referring, more or less, to energy that is coming from a currently unrecognized energy source. Sparky Sweet's device, for instance, is what I am thinking of:
In a sense, solar energy is free energy, in that the source will be there for several billion more years (fusion in the Sun's core). That is pretty inexhaustible for our purposes. But what comes to Earth is diffuse, although life burns energy many thousands of times as fast as the Sun produces it, pound-for-pound. A windmill or waterwheel is farming energy flows from the Sun, so it could be called free, once you built your energy-capture device (and, of course, wind and water power are intermittent). The energy source for what I call free energy has been given many names:
Jeane Manning calls it the background energy of the universe. A waterwheel could be called a free-energy device that harnessed the solar-driven hydrological cycle. So, Sparky Sweet's device could be likened to a waterwheel that tapped the zero-point field by creating a magnetic standing wave. From my understanding of where that energy is coming from, it is as inexhaustible as the Sun and maybe more so. I tend to think of it as abundant and harmlessly produced energy. Solar panels and windmills tend toward that ideal, kind of, but will fall far short of ushering in the so-called post-scarcity society. Does that help?
Do you regard Solar energy as free energy?
Good question. What I have referred to as free energy has been called new energy and other terms. Dennis Lee used "free electricity," in the sense that there would be no fuel charge. Free energy also is a specialized term in thermodynamics (Gibbs), for instance. When I refer to free energy, I am referring, more or less, to energy that is coming from a currently unrecognized energy source. Sparky Sweet's device, for instance, is what I am thinking of:
https://ahealedplanet.net/forum/threads/226-Sparky-Sweet-and-His-Free-Energy-Device?p=3899&viewfull=1#post3899
or what my close friend saw in his underground show:
https://wadefrazier.substack.com/p/free-energy-demonstrations
In a sense, solar energy is free energy, in that the source will be there for several billion more years (fusion in the Sun's core). That is pretty inexhaustible for our purposes. But what comes to Earth is diffuse, although life burns energy many thousands of times as fast as the Sun produces it, pound-for-pound. A windmill or waterwheel is farming energy flows from the Sun, so it could be called free, once you built your energy-capture device (and, of course, wind and water power are intermittent). The energy source for what I call free energy has been given many names:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=846910&viewfull=1#post846910
Jeane Manning calls it the background energy of the universe. A waterwheel could be called a free-energy device that harnessed the solar-driven hydrological cycle. So, Sparky Sweet's device could be likened to a waterwheel that tapped the zero-point field by creating a magnetic standing wave. From my understanding of where that energy is coming from, it is as inexhaustible as the Sun and maybe more so. I tend to think of it as abundant and harmlessly produced energy. Solar panels and windmills tend toward that ideal, kind of, but will fall far short of ushering in the so-called post-scarcity society. Does that help?
Yes. Thanks.
Except the "science" was bought and paid for by the Malthusian Ruline Class Conspiracy and it is false. Scientists are a dime a dozen.
So, carbon dioxide does not trap infrared radiation?